Yesterday, after having visited my sister, her husband and two daughters last week-end and become inspired by their DIY photo albums turned books, I too had a peek at Gör din egen bok (.se) (Swedish för "make your own book" -- visit for a fantastically cheesy sample of how it's pronounced). A rather nice web site lowering the bar almost to making it viable to organize and layout a book on a coffee break, if you already have the photos (and/or text you want to go with them).
Not without its kinks; the java photo uploader applet wouldn't manage to convey the bits of my local images from my macbook, and the site click path to the alternative image dropper (via classic form upload) was hidden rather well, until I managed to bookmark it by pasting together attributes scraped from forms with Firebug. (I reckon you might have to glean up the folderId number on your own to get it to work.)
Anyway, I thought I'd set myself up with a book of nostalgia about Spring in Linköping, where I have been living the past decade -- as I'm planning on moving now, relocating to San Francisco, where I have been head hunted by friends of Jesse Andrews' after our run-in with eachother on hacking away at Book Burro. (It has been literally taking me forever to wrap up my CV, ask peers I have worked with in the field of open source and user scripting for references and letters of support for my petition for an O1 extraordinary persons' visa, and I am really looking forward to being through with it.)
Not really having all that many photos taken there though, and with the smallest book format on offer covering a full 20 pages, I asked around friends whether they wanted to chime in a photo or two on the same theme (and location), before figuring that a map would be neat. I'm still big on Google Maps, even though my blog header rotted and hasn't been revised for the Maps v2 upgrade in November, so I fired up Google Earth to see if I couldn't get some nice visuals there.
Not quite satisfied with what I got, I recalled having read about people doing their own Google Maps photo stiching, and with a bit of help from two articles by Pascal Buirey and Charlie Savage and some guesswork, I managed to wrap up a small pike script to do the scraping for me. (The best part of which was the triumphant moment when my mercator projection latitude compensation suddenly came up with the same coordinates as does Google. :-)
It didn't take long to forget that I was really working on picking up some images for a book, but I eventually did have a decent Google Maps fetcher, to pick a w by h tile segment grid around any given latitude/longitude coordinate and zoom level (granted that Google Maps has satellite image data for it), and paste them together into a big png, jpeg or similar image. It ended up somewhere slightly above "crude", yet below handling geocoding, detecting user error and writing mail and I'm kind of glad I stopped there. (Remember to credit image data copyright holders appropriately if you use it!)
The code requires a typical pike 7.6 (or later) installation, and understands the --help command-line argument for a bit of sparse documentation. The linked articles suggest you may end up getting blocked from the tile servers if you choke them and that it is a good idea to cache tiles. All downloaded images get cached in ~/.gmap/ for you, where you may clean up or not as you please. There is no garbage collection of this cache or code to check whether there is a more recent version of a tile at the image server, so you might want to wipe this directory, if it was a long time since you last ran the tool.
Enjoy! I wonder if I'll finish that photo book. :-)
Webby thoughts, most about around interesting applications of ecmascript in relation to other open web standards. I live in Mountain View, California, and spend some of my spare time co-maintaining Greasemonkey together with Anthony Lieuallen.
2006-12-30
2006-12-25
UnicodeChecker × dabbrev-expand collision
If you run UnicodeChecker, and, like me, find that it gobbles up the Meta-/ keyword binding for (aqua) emacs' dabbrev-expand funciton, here is how to fix it: in the → System Preferences → Keyboard & Mouse → Keyboard Shortcuts view, add (+) a new binding for the menu title HTML Entities → Unicode (cut and paste to get that arrow right) for All Applications to another keyboard shortcut, say, Command Control 4 (yes, I did :-).
While at it, you might want to bind some of the other fancy things there (the location of these commands is the Services → Unicode menu hidden in each program's own menu) to something you'd remember, on the occasion you want to use something like escaping and unescaping HTML entities, UTF-8 URL encoded strings, IDNA (punycode) host addresses and the like on the fly from the clipboard or a text selection. Here are my present bindings:
While at it, you might want to bind some of the other fancy things there (the location of these commands is the Services → Unicode menu hidden in each program's own menu) to something you'd remember, on the occasion you want to use something like escaping and unescaping HTML entities, UTF-8 URL encoded strings, IDNA (punycode) host addresses and the like on the fly from the clipboard or a text selection. Here are my present bindings:
⌘⌃4 HTML Entities → UnicodeThis feature only works in Cocoa programs though, so you're at a loss in Firefox, for instance. You'll also have to restart the program you want to use the binding in to get it to work with the new binding. (For Finder, this means invoking → Force Quit... and picking Finder.)
⌘⌃⇧4 Unicode → HTML Entities, preserving ASCII (& < > " etc.)
⌘⌃5 Replace Percent Escapes
⌘⌃⇧5 Add Percent Escapes
⌘⌃6 Convert from IDNA Hostname representation
⌘⌃⇧6 Convert to IDNA Hostname representation
Categories:
2006-12-04
Firebug 1.0 beta gone public
Good news!
The Firebug 1.0 until-recently private beta has gone public beta -- so you can download it now! We have been a select few to track this puppy throughout the last fortnight, probably drowning Joe in feedback, and it's good. It's really good. It's actually the best surgical hack tool I have been using since the age-old C64 and Amiga Action Replay(s) from Datel Electronics in the nineties, and those cheated by using specialized hardware. ;-)
And better still, the release will remain in the open source, no cost, with the Firefox style tri-license MPL/GPL/LGPL combination, having first being slated for going commercial style product with a dedicated developer hired for it, paid in full by the revenue generated from our purchases of the tool. So, in conclusion, Firebug will only get as much attention as donations can pay for, above the spare time available to Joe, recent full-time ambitious startup founder (Parakey software); quoted from the Firebug blog:
I would suggest you download it, try it out for a day or three, depending on how much time you have to devote to turbo-charging your development pace, improved debuggability, at-a-glance electron microscoping of the HTML, CSS and javascript you encounter in the wild as you browse about your daily life, and if you don't find it worth the $25 (or $15 if you're on a tight budget) suggested in Joe's original post, don't pay. Otherwise, please follow my lead and drop in those donations. (The karma boost alone is great! ;-)
Personally, I'm glad that the in excess of 25,000 (yes!) lines of javascript code that in part make up Firebug (there is a lot of UI graphics, and a few thousand lines of xml, xul and css too, of course) are there for us to browse and learn from, not to mention pore through, when there is some curious aspect to how things work, or you wonder about how to do something Firebug does.
The "beta" tag actually means something here; I, for one, initially encountered a suspiciously high firefox freeze frequency (several times a day) when running earlier beta versions on firefox 2, intel mac, in combination with the Stylish extension, but that mostly went away on disabling the latter extension. There are a few bugs and misfeatures left to polish away (in this case possibly not of Firebug's own fault -- it might just as well be a Stylish issue), and our feedback is still useful, hence the beta period.
Joe has unofficially hinted that version 2 will be all about configurability and extendability. Let's make that come a little sooner rather than (indefinitely) later, shall we?
The Firebug 1.0 until-recently private beta has gone public beta -- so you can download it now! We have been a select few to track this puppy throughout the last fortnight, probably drowning Joe in feedback, and it's good. It's really good. It's actually the best surgical hack tool I have been using since the age-old C64 and Amiga Action Replay(s) from Datel Electronics in the nineties, and those cheated by using specialized hardware. ;-)
And better still, the release will remain in the open source, no cost, with the Firefox style tri-license MPL/GPL/LGPL combination, having first being slated for going commercial style product with a dedicated developer hired for it, paid in full by the revenue generated from our purchases of the tool. So, in conclusion, Firebug will only get as much attention as donations can pay for, above the spare time available to Joe, recent full-time ambitious startup founder (Parakey software); quoted from the Firebug blog:
I hope we can raise enough to create a job for someone who loves building web development tools as much as I do. If not, then I would at least like to use the donations to hire an intern to help out for a while.
I would suggest you download it, try it out for a day or three, depending on how much time you have to devote to turbo-charging your development pace, improved debuggability, at-a-glance electron microscoping of the HTML, CSS and javascript you encounter in the wild as you browse about your daily life, and if you don't find it worth the $25 (or $15 if you're on a tight budget) suggested in Joe's original post, don't pay. Otherwise, please follow my lead and drop in those donations. (The karma boost alone is great! ;-)
Personally, I'm glad that the in excess of 25,000 (yes!) lines of javascript code that in part make up Firebug (there is a lot of UI graphics, and a few thousand lines of xml, xul and css too, of course) are there for us to browse and learn from, not to mention pore through, when there is some curious aspect to how things work, or you wonder about how to do something Firebug does.
The "beta" tag actually means something here; I, for one, initially encountered a suspiciously high firefox freeze frequency (several times a day) when running earlier beta versions on firefox 2, intel mac, in combination with the Stylish extension, but that mostly went away on disabling the latter extension. There are a few bugs and misfeatures left to polish away (in this case possibly not of Firebug's own fault -- it might just as well be a Stylish issue), and our feedback is still useful, hence the beta period.
Joe has unofficially hinted that version 2 will be all about configurability and extendability. Let's make that come a little sooner rather than (indefinitely) later, shall we?